What Revolution?

The Egyptian revolt is an interesting case study, isn't it? What I find remarkable about it is how it drives home how power actually functions in a nation once the rhetoric has diminished and realpolitik takes over.

Naturally, a compromise is being sought among the elites who actually control the nation, as a few of the usual brokers have arrived with made-over resumes. Among them are the killers and thieves who a month ago were right there with Mubarak of course. They're attempting this with the West watching carefully over their shoulders, making sure things are done just right so as to not threaten U.S. and E.U. influence in the region.

It is silly to think that anyone from outside the Egyptian power elites will crack the lineup and change things--though obviously some change will have to occur. How much is the only question. The people have become a terrible distraction all of a sudden; a bone or two will be tossed their way. But the usual suspects will prevail.

In the U.S. we have these ridiculous elections (as opposed to meaningful ones) that make a mockery of freedom by not providing much real leeway in policy, institutional revitalization, or substantive change. One set of power brokers leaves, another fills the void. But look, both sets are usually always made up of the same troupe of puppets and influence peddlers. That's politics. Slimy stuff.

Obama couldn't have gotten there without appeasing the filthy rich "liberal" corporate sect. Before him, GWB had to take his lumps from the "conservative" corporate sect. Not much is different between them, though I actually believe Obama is the smarter and funnier of the two.

In Egypt, as elsewhere, follow the money.

TS